Tier 1 Marketing · Long-term game plan

Replace Me

Not a hiring plan. A plan for which hours leave Abe's calendar, in what order, and what proves they are gone. Two sealed business units, two independent ladders, one owner.

v10 · 2026-08-05 GHL Snapshot FloristMark Model inputs → HANDOFF §2
00

What changed in v10

Mix, overhead, and the AOV rule
ChangeEffect
⚠️ My error — the creator's $12,500 is a priority claim on revenue, not a fixed cost She is paid what the business generates, up to $12,500. There is no hole to fund. Section 08
FloristMark's burn drops $57,813 → ~$2,500 And it is almost entirely the ad ramp in months 1–2
The waterfall is now yours Costs → creator → Abe → reserve → distributions. Clear her, get my minimum, get myself out
The ad-growth decision is reframed Burn is ~$2,500 at every rate. What growth buys is how fast your mother gets to $12,500 — month 5 / 6 / 7
Earlier, in v9:
RM-21 closed — $30/month confirmed FloristMark gates stand at 541 / 595 / 622 / 670
Corrected AOV verified: $44.05 Liquidation is 1.26× at expected — much tighter than the earlier sheet's 2.64×
The 90-day ramp is modeled Conservative → Expected across months 1–3. The funnel does not liquidate until month 4
FloristMark's burn is $48k–$67k, not $13,700 And only ~$3,500 of it is ads. The rest is the $12,500 creator payroll. Section 08
Earlier, in v8 and v7:
The AOV funnel is now simulated You were right that I hadn't done it. Day-one cash is $1,161–$1,369 per buyer, of which $175–$390 is AOV cash the model was blind to. Section 06
The reinvestment loop compounds at every scenario Multiple is 1.74× to 3.91×. Break-even moves month 6 → month 3; Pravesh's full-time trigger fires in month 4, not year two
"Bridge" renamed to burn-rate fund Your word, and the right one
Earlier, in v6:
The bridge, rewritten in plain money My phrasing was jargon. Section 06 now shows month by month what actually leaves your pocket, and what to do about it
Calendar corrected — 10 is the goal, 20 is the ceiling I had the emphasis backwards. You aim for 10 with 100% margin of error
Pravesh gets a $100 prepaid float Two signups held in advance. A sale lands and he starts — no invoice, no approval, no wait
The escalation log is now a role duty Your correction — the hire keeps it, not you. Written into all five role packages
Earlier, in v5:
Claude Pro Max — no split. Both accounts to GHL; one is Pravesh's GHL overhead $763 → $863 · FloristMark $878 → $778
Mix is 90/10, not 70/30 Contribution $366$378.79. Monthly MRR is higher than annual-equivalent monthly, so a heavier monthly mix helps the recurring model
Annual counts only when purchased outright Annual taken as an AOV upsell is ad-spend offset, never contribution. Same for the $47 bump, the commitment upgrades, the DIY kit and Priority Launch. See section 03
Price locked at $397 + $297 / $3,970Confirmed and rebuilt
Revenue Conversion Specialist replaces the Sales Representative Confirmed. Role package now built
CPA — your call stands$350 reached in 45–90 days. Modeled as a ramp, not a tripwire. Section 07
FloristMark trial → paid = 65%Fixed input. 93 trials/month holds the base. Section 09
FloristMark buyer = hobbyist, not careerWritten into the FM Creative Lead package
Full-team GHL gate: 50 → 48 customers. Bridge at your floor pace: $6,850$5,950.
01

The target state

This is the success metric — not headcount, not revenue
Abe's week — the goal
10 hrs
20% management · 80% strategy & analysis. Ceiling is 20 hrs.
Full replacement team
48 GHL · 670 FM
Two separate ladders. Neither subsidises the other.
Day-one burn · GHL
$6,720/mo
Abe $5,500 + overhead $863 + Pravesh retainer $357. Break-even at 18.
Burn-rate fund · GHL
$13,700
Expect ~$7,500 once the reinvestment loop runs. Sections 05–06.
Burn-rate fund · FloristMark
$2,500
The creator's $12,500 is a claim on revenue, not a cost. Section 08.
The reframe. Every previous attempt failed the same way: tasks were delegated, the result was retained. People executed pieces while Abe still decided what happened next, supplied missing context, inspected, corrected, chased, and absorbed the failure when pieces didn't connect. That produces a better-supported freelancer. The mechanism that breaks the loop is not a better hire — it is the decision-rights contract in section 08.
The week · 10 hours is the goal, 20 is the ceiling
mgmt
2h
strategy & analysis · 8h
buffer · 10h
◄——— 10 HRS · THE GOAL ———► ◄——— 20 HRS · THE CEILING ———►
The goal · 10 hrsThe ceiling · 20 hrs
Management, reviews, escalations · 20% 2 hrs4 hrs
Strategy and analysis · 80% 8 hrs16 hrs
Total10 hrs20 hrs
Shape it however you like — two 5-hour days, or five 2-hour days. The 100% margin of error is the design: you aim for 10 and can absorb 20 without anything breaking. And the split is the point — four-fifths of your time is strategy and analysis. Management is the fifth that's left over, not the other way round.
02

Unit economics

Processing standardized at 2.9% + $0.30 across both processors

GHL Snapshot GHL

Monthly · 90%Annual · 10%
Price$397/mo$3,970/yr
Effective monthly$397.00$330.83
Activation fee+$297 oncewaived
Blended
Blended MRR$390.38
Processing 2.9% + $0.30−$11.59
Contribution per customer$378.79
Net cash at signup activation − provisioning +$208.91

FloristMark FM

$30 grandfathered$39 new
Price$30.00$39.00
Processing 2.9% + $0.30−$1.17−$1.43
CloudFront ~2 GB/sub−$0.30−$0.30
App-store cut$0 · browser only$0
Contribution$28.53$37.27
Entry is a $7 paid trial · 14 days, then converts. Sales cycle under two weeks.

Fixed overhead — itemised

ItemGHLFloristMark
GHL agency SaaS$500.00
ElevenLabs$20.00$80.00
AWS server$60.00$100.00
AWS CloudFront ($180/yr)$15.00
QuickBooks$75.00$75.00
Claude Pro Max · 2 × $100 — both GHL, one is Pravesh's$200.00
Canva · $15, split$7.50$7.50
Video production budget · 8 lessons + 20 shorts/mo $500.00
Total per month$862.50$777.50
S-corp adder, from election date+$600.00

Acquisition economics GHL

Paid CPA at target$350
Provisioning · Pravesh$50
Activation collected, blended−$258.91
Net acquisition cost$141
Payback period0.37 months

Why production sits in overhead FM

At $20/lesson and $10–20/short, production is no longer a gating decision — it is a small recurring line. Folded in at $500 so it never becomes an approval that lands on your desk. Cut spec → roles/floristmark-lesson-editor/

Shared tools split 50/50 both

Canva is split half to each business. Claude Pro Max is not split — both seats belong to GHL, and one of them is Pravesh's. The sealed-unit rule governs people, who are paid from a specific unit's revenue; a software seat is an allocated fixed cost.

03

The AOV rule

Written as strategy
Only annual subscriptions purchased outright count toward contribution. Everything monetised inside the AOV funnel after the core decision — annual taken as an upsell, the $47 order bump, the 6-month ($1,800) and 12-month ($3,600) commitment upgrades, the DIY Demand Generation Launch Kit ($497/yr or $997 lifetime), and Priority Launch ($2,500) — is ad-spend offset. It never enters the recurring model.

Why this is the right way round

It keeps two things apart that should never be mixed: the recurring base that has to carry payroll, and the front-end cash that has to carry acquisition. Every gate on this page is funded by subscriptions alone.

What that means in practice

The entire upsell stack sits on top as pure acquisition headroom. The model is deliberately blind to your best cash — which is why the gates below are conservative rather than optimistic, and why ad-spend liquidation is a design feature of your funnel rather than a risk in this plan.

04

Pravesh — hourly, not salaried

The largest saving in the plan

At your target pace this role runs about 10 hours a week. A 20 hr/week salary would overpay by roughly half; a 40 hr/week salary by three-quarters. Hourly is correct until acquisition roughly triples — and it carries no hiring reserve, because hourly work has no 90-day commitment to fund.

The compensation model GHL

New-account provisioning · 2.5 hrs$50/signup
Ramp allowance · first 5 accountsup to $100 ea
Platform maintenance retainer · 4 hrs/wk$357/mo

The retainer is a retainer, not a timesheet. It buys first-call priority over every other project — enforced through Asana priority, made durable by writing it into the agreement.

What the hours actually look like

Signups/wkTotal hrs/wkCost/mo
1.25 floor7.1~$634
2.25 target9.6~$857
516.5~$1,473
6.4 convert20.0$1,785
14.440.0$3,571
Conversion trigger, written: convert to a full-time salary when logged hours exceed 20 per week for 3 consecutive weeks — roughly 6–7 signups/week sustained, about 3× the current target. Cost +$3,214/mo, moving the top gate 50 → 58. Track weekly hours from day one; the number is the trigger and it costs nothing to watch. Without it, the conversion happens the way these things always happen: as an emergency, after something breaks, decided at the worst possible moment.
05

Your burn-rate fund

What actually leaves your pocket, and when it stops
Yes — this is exactly your burn-rate fund. Adopting your word, because it is the right one. It is the money that pays you your $5,500 and keeps the lights on while the business is still too small to do it.

It is not a savings account you build first. It is money that leaves your pocket month by month until customer 18 — and then it stops.

What it costs you every month, before any customers

Your protected income$5,500
Software and tools$863
Pravesh's retainer$357
Total monthly cost$6,720

What every customer brings in

Every month, ongoing$378.79
Once, at signup $297 activation less Pravesh's $50$208.91

So the shortfall shrinks every single month. At 18 customers it reaches zero and the business pays for itself.

Month by month, at 3 new customers a month

MonthCustomersThey pay you Signup cashYour costsOut of your pocket
13$1,136$777$6,870$4,957
26$2,273$777$6,870$3,820
39$3,409$777$6,870$2,684
412$4,545$777$6,870$1,548
515$5,682$777$6,870$411
618$6,818$777$6,870$0 — it pays for itself
Total out of your pocket~$13,700

Costs include Pravesh's $50 provisioning per new signup. The $250 ramp allowance for his first five builds is in the total.

At the other two paces

If you signMonthsTotal out of pocket
9/month — your target2~$1,700
5/month — your floor3~$5,950
3/month — the slow ramp6~$13,700

So what do you actually do about it

Nothing to save up in advance. You need roughly $5,000/month of agency income (or savings) coming in for the first six months, tapering to zero by month six. That is the number.

The practical rule: do not shut the agency down until either (a) you have ~$13,700 banked, or (b) agency income is reliably covering ~$5,000/month for the next six months. Whichever comes first.

With the reinvestment loop running (section 06), it is much smaller

MonthCustomersRevenueYour costsGap
14.5$1,704$6,945−$5,241
212.9$4,896$7,141−$2,245
328.7$10,877$7,510+$3,368 — covered
Burn-rate fund needed~$7,500

Two months, not six. The earlier table assumes no compounding at all.

Fund $13,700 anyway. The compounding case assumes CPA holds at $667 while you scale the budget 3.5× in three months — precisely the assumption most likely to break (section 06). Fund the pessimistic number, expect the optimistic one.
06

The AOV reinvestment loop — simulated

You were right that I hadn't done this

I was treating $3,000/month as a static budget. It isn't — your design sends day-one cash straight back into the PayPal account that funds ads, so the budget compounds. Here is what the simulation says.

Take rates below are mine, not yours. Prices come from your funnel doc; the take rates are my estimates and are the only invented numbers on this page. Replace them with real figures the moment you have them — every number in this section moves with them.
ItemPriceConservativeBaseStrong
Order bump$4720%25%30%
Commitment upgrade monthly path$1,800 / $3,6005%8%12%
DIY Launch Kit$497 / $9977%10%14%
Priority Launch annual path$2,5007%10%15%

Day-one cash per buyer

Conservative
$1,161
$175 of it is AOV cash the model never counted.
Base
$1,250
$267 of it is AOV cash the model never counted.
Strong
$1,369
$390 of it is AOV cash the model never counted.

$1,021.60 of that is base subscription cash already in the model ($397 + $297 monthly, $3,970 annual, blended 90/10). Everything above it is cash the plan has been completely blind to.

The reinvestment multiple — day-one cash ÷ CAC

CACConservativeBaseStrong
$667 your launch conversion rate1.74×1.87×2.05×
$5002.32×2.50×2.74×
$350 your target3.32×3.57×3.91×
Every single cell is above 1.0. Even the worst combination — conservative take rates at the pessimistic launch CAC — nearly doubles the ad budget every month. That is the finding, and it is the thing my earlier "$3,000/mo pace" table completely missed.

Month by month · base case · $667 CAC · 100% reinvested

MonthAd budgetBuyersCumulativeDay-one cash out
1$3,0004.54.5$5,621
2$5,6218.412.9$10,532
3$10,53215.828.7 — past break-even$19,734
4$19,73429.658.3 — past the full-team gate$36,976
5$36,97655.4113.7$69,282

Break-even at 18 customers lands in month 3, not month 6. The full-team gate at 48 lands in month 4. The loop is roughly twice as fast as the slow-ramp column in section 05.

The constraint is not cash

1 · CPA stability as the budget scales

The month-4 budget is 6.6× the month-1 budget. Ad platforms reset learning phases on large budget steps, audiences saturate, and commercial and industrial electrical contractors is a narrow pool. If CPA rises to ~$1,250 the multiple hits 1.0 and compounding stops dead.

Step the budget on a schedule you control — 20–30% increases against proven CPA — rather than dumping every dollar back the moment it lands. The loop still compounds at 20% steps; it just doesn't break the ad account.

2 · Pravesh's capacity — and it arrives first

At 29.6 signups in month 4, he is at 29.6 × 2.5 = 74 hours + 17 baseline ≈ 91 hours/month ≈ 21 hours per week.

His full-time conversion trigger fires in month 4 — not year two. That changes the character of the decision completely. Budget for it now: +$3,214/month, and have the conversation with him before the loop makes it urgent.

One wrinkle worth naming. The commitment upgrade ($1,800 for 6 months) pulls cash forward at a 24.4% discount — $1,800 ÷ 6 = $300/month against $397. It is excellent for the reinvestment loop and it reduces future recurring revenue. At 8% take that is roughly $7.75/month of recurring given up per buyer, about 2% of contribution. Small, real, and worth watching if the take rate climbs well above 8%.
07

The two ladders

Independent. Neither subsidises the other.

GHL Snapshot GHL

net active customers · $378.79 each · scale 0 → 48
Baseline — Abe + overhead + Pravesh retainer $6,720/mo
18day one
+ Marketing & Content Operator $8,059/mo
22gate 1
+ Creative & Conversion Lead $9,844/mo
26gate 2
+ Revenue Conversion Specialist $13,964/mo · release at 30, reserve-backed
37gate 3
+ Support & Onboarding $18,124/mo
48replaced

FloristMark FM

net active subscribers · first 500 @ $28.53, new @ $37.27 · scale 0 → 670
Protected floor — creator + Abe + overhead $15,778/mo
541floor
+ Marketing & Platform Operator $17,787/mo
595gate 1
+ AI-Assisted Support Reviewer $18,791/mo
622gate 2
+ Creative & Conversion Lead $20,576/mo
670replaced
Grandfathering is locked, as strategy. Existing subscribers stay at $30 permanently; $39 applies to new subscribers only, from #501.
At 500 subscribers: the creator is fully paid at $12,500 and Abe receives $987 of his $2,500. His minimum closes at 541.

Adders — what each future step costs at the top gate

AdderWhen it triggersCost/moGHL gateFM gate
Baseline as modeled48670
S-corp electionNot before customer 18+$60050
Creative Lead steps to $30/hrMonth 6, on the exit test+$89351694
Pravesh converts to full-time salary3 weeks over 20 hrs+$3,21457
All threeFully loaded steady state+$4,70761694

No health-stipend adder. The Revenue Conversion Specialist is remote, not US W-2, so only Support remains US W-2 — and you declined benefits there. That question closes at zero cost.

Reserves · GHL GHL

Marketing & Content Operator$4,020
Creative & Conversion Lead$5,355
Revenue Conversion Specialist$12,360
Support & Onboarding$12,480
Total$34,215

Pravesh carries none — hourly has no 90-day commitment to fund. The specialist being remote rather than US W-2 saves $2,640 of reserve.

Why the specialist releases at 30, not 38 GHL

Cash-neutral with the role installed is 37. Releasing at 30 runs a −$2,600/mo position that closes in three months at your 5/month floor, drawing ~$3,306 of the $12,360 reserve — 27%. Nearly 4× buffer.

Before that, you are the specialist. Your doc: "At launch there is no salesperson — it is the owner." Two non-consecutive call blocks per week, live webinar weekly for 6–8 weeks then twice monthly, and no sales calls on marketing production days — the context switch kills both.

08

FloristMark AOV model — reviewed and ramped

$30/month confirmed · gates unchanged

Your arithmetic, reproduced independently

LineExpectedConservative
Trial · $7 × 100$700$700
Bump · $27$945 35%$405 15%
Upsell-1 · $300$1,500 5%$1,200 4%
Upsell-2 · $120$840 7%$480 4%
Downsell · $60$420 7%$180 3%
Total per 100 trials$4,405$2,965
AOV$44.05 ✓ matches your sheet$29.65

Trial→paid of 0.65 matches exactly what you told me earlier, and retention 94%/85% brackets your stated 8–10% churn. The inputs are internally consistent.

The 90-day ramp · conservative → expected

MonthCost per trialAOVLiquidationStatus
1$65$29.650.46×loses $35.35 per trial
2$55$34.400.62×loses $20.60 per trial
3$45$39.300.88×loses $5.70 per trial
4+$35$44.051.26×liquidates ✅
The funnel does not liquidate until month 4. That is not a problem — it is the ramp working exactly as you described — but it means the first 90 days are paid for, not self-funding.
The weekly check — one comparison, and it moves with the ramp. Break-even cost per trial is that month's AOV. So the only question is: is my actual cost per trial at or below this month's target?

Month 1 $29.65 · Month 2 $34.40 · Month 3 $39.30 · Month 4 onward $44.05

At the expected end you have $9.05 of headroom ($44.05 break-even against a $35 target) — about 26%. Real, but not generous. Cost per trial is the number to watch weekly, and it is the only one FloristMark needs.
⚠️ Correction — I had the creator's $12,500 modeled wrong. I treated it as a fixed monthly obligation that had to be funded from a burn account. It isn't. It is a priority claim on revenue. She is paid what the business generates, up to $12,500 — if month 1 produces $600, she is paid $600, not $12,500 with an $11,900 hole to fill.

That erases the $58,000 burn I put on this business. The real number is ~$2,500.

The FloristMark waterfall — your order

1

Costs

Overhead $778, ad spend, production, and any hired payroll.

2

The creator — up to $12,500/month

Everything available goes to her first.

3

Abe — up to $2,500/month

4

Hiring reserve for the next role

5

Quarterly distributions, 50/50

In your words: clear her, then get my minimum, then get myself out. That is the sequence and it is now the model.

What Abe actually has to fund · 35%/mo ad growth

MoSubsContributionOverhead Ad gapAvailableCreatorAbe ReserveAbe funds
121$593$778$1,632−$1,817$0$0$0$1,817
256$1,603$778$1,521−$696$0$0$0$696
3122$3,488$778$682$2,028$2,028$0$0$0
4252$7,190$778$6,412$6,412$0$0$0
5422$12,038$778$11,260$11,260$0$0$0
6646$18,443$778$17,665$12,500 ✅$2,500 ✅$2,665$0
7945$26,959$778$26,181$12,500$2,500$11,181$0
Total Abe funds$2,513

FloristMark's burn-rate fund is ~$2,500, almost entirely the ad ramp in months 1–2. Once cost per trial reaches the month-3 target the ads pay for themselves and nothing else needs funding — the creator simply receives less until the business grows into her number.

So the ad-growth decision is about her, not about burn

Ad growthAbe fundsCreator hits $12,500Abe's $2,500Reserve starts
70%/mo$2,627Month 5Month 5Month 5
35%/mo — recommended$2,513Month 6Month 6Month 6
20%/mo$2,464Month 7Month 7Month 7
Recommendation: 35%/month. The burn difference across all three is $163 — irrelevant. The real difference is one month of your mother's income. 70% gets her there a month sooner but puts spend at 41× by month 8, which is where cost per trial breaks and the whole thing stalls — costing her far more than the month it saved. 35% is the fastest rate that doesn't risk the engine that pays her.
The "500 subscribers" number, restated correctly. At 500 subscribers FloristMark produces $14,265, less $778 overhead = $13,487 available. The creator is fully paid at $12,500, and Abe receives $987 of his $2,500 — short by $1,513.

That is what my old "$1,513/month short" line actually meant, and it reads very differently now: it is not a hole in the business. It is the last stretch of Abe's own minimum, and it closes at 541 subscribers.

What is genuinely strong in this model

  • Payback is inside one month — the trial is 7 days, so membership revenue starts in the same month as the spend
  • Upsell-1 at $300 carries 34% of expected AOV and 40% of conservative. Highest-leverage thing to test — a 2-point conversion move on it beats doubling the bump
  • The bump is the most reliable line — $945 per 100 trials at expected, and the cheapest conversion in the stack
09

Revenue Conversion Specialist

Adopted wholesale from your sales-motion doc

Not a closer. Delivers the live webinar, moderates Q&A and chat, takes qualified 15-minute calls, records async video answers, follows up with high-intent registrants, and feeds recurring objections back into the webinar, VSL, AI and follow-up. This structure is better than what I proposed and I discarded mine.

ComponentStructure
Base$4,000/mo, location-neutral remote — the motion does not require a US mid-market AE
OTE at target$6,500–7,000/mo · $60k–90k/yr
Human-assisted close — annual$250
Human-assisted close — monthly$100 after first payment clears + $100 retention bonus after the third
Cohort-performance bonusRolling ≥200 registrants: <6.5% base only · 6.5–7.49% $500 · 7.5–8.49% $1,000 · 8.5%+ $1,500
Rep-created opportunitiesAnnual 10% of collected cash ($397) · monthly $150 after first + $100 after third
Payment basisCash collected, with refund/chargeback clawback
The cohort bonus is the part worth noticing. It pays the specialist for improving the whole environment rather than for last-touch credit — the only comp design consistent with a motion where the webinar, VSL, AI and follow-up do most of the selling and the human resolves a narrow final question.
10

Decision rights

The anti-relapse mechanism

Every hire gets this table in writing on day one. Anything not listed defaults to the role, not to Abe. That default is deliberate and it is the entire mechanism.

DecisionAbeRole decides & informsEscalate
Weekly priorities and deadlines
Assignment creation from the quarterly strategy
Routine QA approval / rejection
Directing contractors and vendors
Customer communication (non-refund)
Spend within the role's monthly cap
Refunds / credits above threshold
Spend above cap, or any new recurring spend
Any custom client request GHL
Quarterly strategy, offer, pricing
Hiring, firing, compensation
Anything that changes what the product is
Anything that asks the creator to record differently FM

Monthly spend caps

  • Creative & Conversion Lead$1,500
  • Marketing Operator$500
  • Support — credits and refunds$250
  • Pravesh — tooling and API$500

Abe retains

  • Quarterly strategy and offer direction
  • Pricing
  • Weekly performance and attribution review
  • Batch approval of the quarter's angles
  • Capital allocation and hiring
  • Automation architecture, until handed off
  • Leadership review — 60 min/wk GHL, 60 min/2wks FM
11

The roles

Ordered by hours-of-Abe returned per dollar

GHL Snapshot

RoleTriggerLoaded/moReserveAbe is out when…
Pravesh
Fulfilment & Automation · $20/hr hourly
Day one
bridge-funded
$357 + $50/signupnone A provisioning or API failure occurs and is resolved before Abe knows it happened.
Marketing & Content Operator
$15/hr × 20 hr/wk
22 net customers
held 3 months
$1,339$4,020 A full campaign ships — build, publish, email, tracking — without Abe touching the queue.
Creative & Conversion Lead
$20 → $25 at 90d → $30 at 6mo
26 net customers
held 3 months
$1,785$5,355 A quarter's angles → copy → briefs → assignments flow from one strategy session.
Revenue Conversion Specialist
$4,000/mo base, remote · full comp §06
30 net customers
+ 30 qualified leads/mo
$4,120$12,360 Abe delivers zero webinars and takes zero calls for 30 days, and cohort conversion holds.
Support & Onboarding
$20/hr FT · US W-2 · no benefits at hire
48 net customers
or >15 tickets/wk
$4,160$12,480 Zero support items reach Abe for 30 straight days; onboarding Zooms self-schedule.

FloristMark

RoleTriggerLoaded/moReserveAbe is out when…
Marketing & Platform Operator
$18/hr × 25 hr/wk · technical ownership folded in
595 net subs$2,009$6,030 Multilingual content publishes on schedule and the lesson pipeline runs end to end without Abe in it.
AI-Assisted Support Reviewer
$15/hr × 10–15 hr/wk
622 net subs
or >20 tickets/wk
$1,004$3,015 24-hour SLA held for 30 straight days with zero tickets reaching Abe.
Creative & Conversion Lead
$20 → $25 → $30 · different person to GHL's
670 net subs$1,785$5,355 A quarter of angles, clips and campaigns is produced from the creator's footage on one strategy session.
Lesson Editor
3-camera MEVO, auto-synced · 15–20 min
Per video
in overhead
$20
+$10 clean pass
n/a Lessons go from three-camera raw to publish-ready against a written cut spec, with no Abe involvement.
Short-Form Video Editor
clips, captions, resizing
Per video
in overhead
$10–20n/a Clip packs are ordered by the Creative Lead, not by Abe.

Role packages — built

Not hired

  • No sales manager
  • No separate copywriter — the Creative Leads own copy QA
  • No graphic designer — AI, stock photography and software screenshots
  • No dedicated ad manager initially
  • No internal bookkeeper — automation prepares the work, outside accounting reviews it
  • No FloristMark salesperson
12

Flags

Every flag names its unit and carries a recommendation
RM-18GHL Snapshotyour call — closed

CPA — modeled as a ramp, not a tripwire

You expect to reach $350 within 45–90 days on the strength of your own ad work. Taken as given and modeled that way.

My earlier "pace at $3,000/mo" table was wrong-headed and I've removed it. It treated the budget as fixed. It isn't — section 06 shows the budget compounding at 1.74×–3.91× per month, so "how many customers does $3,000 buy" was never the right question. The right question is how fast the loop compounds before CPA degrades.

WindowExpected CACReinvestment multipleWhat it means
Days 0–45~$667 while creative and funnel tune1.87×Budget still nearly doubles monthly
Days 45–90Converging2.50×Compounding accelerates
Day 90+$3503.57×Fulfilment capacity becomes the limit, not cash
On cost per registrant — being specific, as you asked: the only number that would make the CAC math checkable rather than assumed is what you pay in ad spend to produce one webinar registration. Nothing about the AOV funnel or the upsells — just ads in, registrations out. $3,000 ÷ registrations = cost per registrant; divide by your 14-day cohort conversion rate and you have CAC. But it is now a diagnostic, not a gate. You have told me the number and the timeline, and nothing in the plan hangs on my verifying it. The model no longer asks.
RM-17GHL Snapshotretired

The annual attach-rate check — the question dissolved

I recommended tracking annual attach rate weekly. That was built on a 30% annual mix. At 90/10 it is not a lever — annual is a rounding difference in the recurring model, and annual-taken-as-an-upsell is already classed as ad offset by the AOV rule in section 03. Nothing to explain, nothing to track. The recommendation is withdrawn.

For the record: at 90/10 the core offer alone returns ~$4,598 per 100 registrants against $3,000 of ad spend — 1.53× — before a single upsell. The entire AOV stack sits on top of that as additional offset. Liquidation is a design feature of your funnel, not a risk in this plan.
RM-03FloristMarkclosed

Churn and trials — one calculation, no sensitivity table

Monthly churn midpoint of your 8–10%9%
Subscribers at full team670
Replacements needed monthly60
Trial → paid65%
Trials needed monthly to hold93
Trial revenue at 93 trials$651/mo toward acquisition

65% is a fair rate for a $7 low-ticket trial with immediate onboarding and feedback, backed by the retention stack: human outreach to every new subscriber, an AI assistant, a community where members submit arrangements for review, the by-the-stem florist directory, local sourcing resources, and full localization and dubbing no competitor matches.

Positioning, on the record: the customer is a hobbyist. Floral design as a hobby — not vocational training, not a path to becoming a working florist. That distinction governs every piece of copy this business produces and is now written into the FloristMark Creative Lead package.
RM-01both units

The relapse risk is Abe, not the hires

In one sentence: the risk is not that you hire badly. It is that you keep answering questions you already gave away.

That is the whole flag. Everything below is mechanism.

The escalation log — now a role duty, not yours. Your correction, and it is a better design than mine. I had you tracking whether you were being pulled back in. Wrong person. The hire keeps the log. It is written into all five role packages as a stated first-90-days responsibility:

"You keep a running log of every question you escalated to Abe — what you asked, and what the decision rights table said about it. You bring it to the weekly review. If Abe answers something the table already assigns to you, he replies 'your call' and it goes in the log as a training gap, not a decision."

Two signals that the contract is wrong rather than the person: more than 2 out-of-scope escalations per week by day 60, or your week sitting at the 20-hour ceiling instead of the 10-hour goal. Either one means the role's boundaries were written badly. Fix the contract before you question the hire.
ClosedRM-01 is the only flag still open

Everything else has a decision

  • RM-19 GHL Price corrected to $397 + $297 / $3,970
  • RM-20 GHL Sales Rep replaced by the Revenue Conversion Specialist
  • RM-02 GHL No benefits — closes at zero cost now that only Support is US W-2
  • RM-05 GHL Commission superseded by the sales-motion structure
  • RM-06 FM Browser-only purchases, no app-store cut
  • RM-09 GHL S-corp $600/mo from election
  • RM-12 FM Waterfall order written as strategy
  • RM-13 both Creative Lead ramp $20 → $25 → $30, both packages built
  • RM-14 FM Grandfathering written as strategy
  • RM-15 GHL Pravesh hourly, trigger written, package built
  • RM-16 FM $20/video holds, cut spec built

Earlier: RM-04 margin rebuilt · RM-07 FM technical ownership folded into the Platform Operator · RM-08 two-phase pricing · RM-10 bridge quantified · RM-11 conversion role pulled forward.

13

Next actions

Five — everything else is decided
  1. GHL Send Pravesh the Fulfilment & Automation agreement — $20/hr, $50/signup, $357 retainer, $100 prepaid float, convert at 3 weeks over 20 hours. He starts day one, before the first customer.roles/
  2. FM Do the one manual DaVinci pass and fill in section 4 of the cut spec. It is the only blocker left anywhere in the package.roles/
  3. GHL Give me real AOV take rates when you have them — bump, commitment upgrade, DIY kit, Priority Launch. They are the only invented numbers left in the plan and every figure in section 06 moves with them.§06
  4. GHL Warn Pravesh that full-time may land in month 4, not year two. The reinvestment loop puts him at ~21 hrs/week by then.RM-15
  5. GHL Decide the agency question: ~$13,700 banked, or ~$5,000/month of agency income for six months. Do not shut it down until one of those is true.§05